On Looking: How Travel Writers Pay Attention

Posted by on Nov 20, 2013 in Travel, Writing | 9 Comments

2863426555_c6b2a334a9_z

How much do we see – and how much do we miss?

 . . . on my return I felt plenty pleased with myself and my walk. Surely I had seen all that really mattered on the block. Not a car passed without my gaze upon it; nary a building got by un-ogled. I had stared down the trees; I even knew one’s name. I had eyeballed the passerby; noted a daring squirrel; spied a wooly caterpillar. I was consciously looking. What could I have missed?

In On Looking: Eleven Walks With Expert Eyes, Alexandra Horowitz sets herself the challenge of paying attention. She chooses a single walking route round her neighborhood and tests out her observational skills, assuming they’re more than adequate (she teaches psychology and animal cognition at Columbia University, and her previous perception-investigating book, Inside Of A Dog, was a New York Times bestseller).

Instead, she learns that paying attention isn’t something we can just turn on and off at will. Almost all of us have very specific ways of looking at the world, and outside of each narrow focus, it’s a blur to us. It’s invisible, even when we see it every day.

As it turns out, I was missing pretty much everything. After taking the walks described in this book, I would find myself at once alarmed, delighted, and humbled at the limitations of my ordinary looking. My consolation is that this deficiency of mine is quite human. We see, but we do not see: we use our eyes, but our gaze is glancing, frivolously considering its object. We see the signs, but not their meanings. We are not blinded, but we have blinders.

xxx-horowitz-looking-books--3_4

In this gorgeous, riveting book, Horowitz explores the depth of her perceptual ignorance. She takes the same walk again and again, accompanied by experts with their own very specific ways of seeing the world. A geologist. A typographer. A sound engineer. Accompanied by a globe-trotting blind woman, she learned to see with her ears – and accompanied by her dog (the subject of Inside Of A Dog), she goes on “smell walks”. Her conclusions are filled with unsettling revelation:

I reckon that every child has been admonished by teacher or parent to “pay attention.” But no one tells you how to do that.

Read Maria Popova’s enthusiastic write-up of the book here (she describes it as “breathlessly wonderful”).

Watching the crowd gather outside the Treasurer's House, York. Ghosts gather outside the Treasurer’s House, York. Alternative title: Mike’s Photography Has Some Way To Go.

At TBEX Dublin, I listened to Don George talk about his approach to travel writing.

My notes are a wild scribble (I was really into his talk) — but the things that came out again and again were:

Find your passion points — the things you’ll obsessively research because you care so much. Embrace your inner dork.

…and…

Continually ask yourself “What Am I Learning Here?”

Travel writers interpret the world for their audience, and the results are always subjective. The way Jonathan Raban might interpret a scene could be very different from the way Bill Bryson does (for a start, these days everyone knows what Bill Bryson looks like. It’s no wonder that veterans like Colin Thubron work incredible hard to stay anonymous when they’re on the move).

Good travel writers see the world like literary journalists do, finding the “felt details” in ordinary things that make the story feel real to its audience . . . the material human truths everyone can recognise. Bad travel writers strip-mine the voices of all the writers they’ve ever read, ignoring what their own senses are teaching them. They do the literary equivalent of not listening to what someone is saying because they’re thinking up their next witty retort. They miss everything.

Travel writers who have journalistic backgrounds have training of some kind, either formally or just by being around people who know how to look for those details that bring stories alive. And travel writers without that background? It doesn’t matter if they’ve learned those skills another way – but some don’t. What gets classed as “bad writing” by editors and industry veterans is usually writing that doesn’t try to see. Its authors miss the details and in doing so miss the story, ending up with something flat and joyless that struggles to do its job.

When I look at my worst travel writing & blogging, it’s guilty of the same thing. There’s a lack of attention to detail that I’ve tried to paper over with sweeping statements. I didn’t see enough at the time, so I backfilled a little with my own imagination – not enough to lie, but too much to effectively capture what it was really like. In contrast, my best stuff conveys a pretty good approximation of what I was experiencing, with the emphasis on “I”, subjectively presenting a personal argument. (Usually something about how self-inflicted misery is wonderful and everyone should get out there and wallow in it for their own good.) My passion points – cultural anthropology, travel literature, a deep & masochistic love of sleeping in a garish sack in the open air –  are my bias, and my writing filters through them and takes on a distinct flavour.

What I’m now wondering is — just how different are the many different travel writers out there, in terms of how they see the world? What are their specific ways of seeing the world — and what can they teach us?

I’ll do some digging another time. Stay tuned.

We see the signs, but not their meanings.

I do this all the time when I’m out walking. I see glimpses of things: almost certainly random chance at work, but they usually feel like a message I’m on the verge of understanding . . . but never do.

Above: sunlight through trees, trying to spell something out.

And from an icy puddle, a startled bird taking flight in a scatter of feathers – except it isn’t, it’s just ice forming on a puddle, right? Unworthy of attention? Boring?

Not if you’re an earth scientist.

And so it goes.

All photos: Mike Sowden
  • http://www.candicedoestheworld.com Candice

    Awesome. I MUST read this book.

  • http://www.worldismycuttlefish.wordpress.com The World Is My Cuttlefish

    I got a lot out of this post, Mike, including a laugh at the caption beneath your photo of the Treasurer’s House. Thank you.

  • http://www.thecaffeinateddaytripper.com/ Erin

    I really enjoyed the photo. A happy accident, I think :)

  • http://www.fivefeetflat.net Anis

    Wow, talk about great timing. I’ve been asked to say a few words on psychogeography next month and the idea of these eleven walks with different companions is WONDERFUL! Thanks, Mike, definitely going to look out for this book.

  • http://www.diaryofamuzungu.com CharlieBeau Diary of a Muzungu

    I love this idea and would love to run the same experiment one day …. perhaps I already do? Where some people see dirt in a slum, I notice the birds; where some see disorder, I notice the colour… thought provoking!

  • http://perfectspain.com AJS

    Sometimes after a trip I feel like I was on a train getting quick glances into the backrooms and gardens that line to tracks.

    So many experiences, lives and stories that speed by. If I only get a grasp of one the trip was a success.

  • http://alyssawrites.com Alyssa

    Thanks for posting about this book – I’ll definitely have to check it out! I studied psychology in university and that was definitely a common theme: we experience through a set of schemas and interpret that information with those preconceptions.

    I’ll definitely have to pay more attention to paying attention :)

  • http://www.outdoorsinportugal.com Nick

    Thats the first time I have ever heard anyone mention Jonathan Raban. I know, I know that wasn’t the point of your illuminating post, but I love his writing.

    Fascinating one, thanks Mike.

  • http://ausglobetrotter.com Jaryd

    Awesome post, It also worries me a little. Especially as I think how much of the world I have seen, but come to think of it now, how much have I really seen? Although I am grateful I have travelled, not for the fact that I have seen so much (or little) but that being at home I noticed those of us in routine see hardly anything. It is all one blur as we pass by the same signs, buildings, parks and people day in day out on the way to work, school or where ever we spend the better part of our life. it’s quite shocking really and I have a specific word for everything it is we see, but don’t really see. It will come out in a post you have just inspired me to write, so thank you Mike.